Does my vote count?

voteIf you live in the United Kingdom you must know by now that we are about to have a general election. I say this for the benefit of my overseas readers, because in the U.K., newspapers and television are full of election coverage. Yet the election comes at a time when interest in politics is at an all-time low. Recent scandals have tarred all politicians with the same brush. Most of the parties are fighting for the middle ground, and people feel that there is not much to choose between them. So why should I bother to vote?

Do I vote for an person or for a party?

In theory we vote for an individual prospective member of parliament. But for government to work, it needs the support of a majority, and so the concept of a political party was formed. Members of parliament must work together with like-minded people for a party to be viable.

Very few of us have the advantage of knowing any of the candidates we can vote for. A friend of mine is standing as a candidate in a neighbouring constituency. If I could, I would vote for him as an individual, but geography makes that impossible. I can read the literature the candidates distribute, but the leaflets are full of official party policies and give very little insight into the personal views, character and integrity of the person. So in practice I will have to choose a party.

Do I vote for the party leaders?

In the United Kingdom we do not have a president and we cannot vote directly to choose a prime minister. When all the votes are counted, and M.P.s are elected, the Prime Minister will in practice be the party leader who can rely on the support of a majority in the House of Commons. That majority will either be from his own party, or perhaps from a combination of parties working formally or informally together.

But in the press and television all the focus is upon the party leaders. We, the electorate, have no say in who the parties choose as a leader. Indeed, we may find that some unsuccessful leaders are replaced by other eager candidates after the election. We should not really base our vote on the eloquence of the party leader, but we cannot help being influenced by the leaders personality (or lack of it).

The race for the middle ground.

Most voters in the United Kingdom are not believers in extreme right-wing or left-wing politics. We are not choosing between Fascism or Communism. Most parties are struggling for the middle ground. They all try to say that they stand up for ordinary people – and it is ordinary people who will decide the result of this election!

Merging of policies

All the parties say that they are uniquely different from other parties, and yet most people cannot see big differences between them. They claim that their policies would produce a stronger economy, that the deficit and national debt will be cut, that our borders will be controlled, and that our National Health Service will be protected. The parties try to outdo each other in promising how many billions will be spent on health, education and defence and how they will save money without effecting basic services!

I am not trying to say that there are not real differences of attitude and underlying motivation, but that at election times they all try to present their policies to attract the middle ground. In this article, I am trying very hard to not let my very strong feelings on political matters show, and people who know me personally, and Facebook ‘friends’, will be aware of my political leanings. There are parties I could not possibly vote for, not because of election promises, but because I do not trust their perspective and their commitment to look after the powerless and vulnerable as well as being interested in ordinary people. But enough said!

The long fight for freedom

We, in the United Kingdom, need to be aware of the long fight for freedom and democracy. It is a reason why every citizen should vote. Democracy, as a system, is not perfect, but is probably the best available. People have given their lives for us to have the chance to choose our government. Woman have chained themselves to the railings of parliament and suffered imprisonment to give women an equal right to choose who governs them.

In the world today, many people either cannot vote or have any real choice in who to vote for. Corruption can distort the way the elected accurately reflect the public vote. But in Britain, election corruption is negligible so I would say to everyone, “Get out and vote”.

What is one vote worth?

If I live in an area which always votes one way, I may think that it is a waste of time voting. My vote is only one of millions and statistically insignificant. Because I feel so strongly, I would like to think that my views are worth more than other people’s, but that is pride. I can influence others, but I only have one vote. But if no one voted, the way would be open to anarchy or dictatorship. One thing we can say is the only wasted vote is by the non-voter.

None of the above

There has been some discussion about having another option on the ballot paper enabling people to put their “X” against an en entry, “None of the above”. If you really cannot make up your mind, it would be good to state that, and still be counted. This seems to be much better than being lumped in with the apathetic or lazy, who don’t bother to vote. If enough people voted, “none of the above”, the politicians should take notice.

Even though there is no such option as “none of the above”, you can still make known your feelings by writing “none of the above” on the ballot paper. As such it will be counted as a spoilt ballot paper, scrutinised by the candidates or their agents, and included in an announced total at the count. But I do not recommend this unless you feel that there is nothing to choose between candidates – in which case it seems a perfectly adequate way of expressing your preference.

Vote with your heart

We are sometimes tempted to vote tactically but we cannot always calculate the result. I remember once when we, as a family, voted to decide the name of our new dog. One of my sons, tried to vote tactically, but it back-fired on him, leaving his favourite name being not chosen. Beware of tactical voting; it may not have the result you really wanted! If I was Spock from Star Trek, I would vote logically using my head, but I intend to vote with my heart…

So I would encourage everyone to vote, with your head or your heart if you care where we as a country are going. Remember the only way to waste a vote is not to vote at all.

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 290 other followers

Comments

  1. Two comments:
    1) I don’t believe that a modern “democracy” is a good form of government, as it is too vulnerable to corruption via corporate donations to parties and biased media coverage. It also tends to pitch the interests of one group of people against those of other groups of people. The group that gets the most votes tends to look after their people at the expense of the others.
    Indeed, the founding fathers of the USA created it as a “republic” (with a constitution that considers the rights of all people) rather than a democracy because of the limitations of democracies. Sadly the principles upon which the USA was founded have now been eroded in favour of corporate greed. The fact that corporations were given full constitutional rights (after some very dubious legal rulings) certainly did not help with this.
    2) As Benito Mussolini said “Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism because it is a merger of state and corporate power”. That is sadly where we’re already at, with all of our so-called “centrist” parties all vying for corporate donations, they align their policies with the desires of big business, at the expense of the wider population and the environment. Green is the only English party that doesn’t accept large corporate donations (as far as I know), and that reflects significantly in their policies.

    Like

    • Interesting comments. Democracy relies on an informed public and that is one of the reasons why it has fallen down in the US, as we are generally uninformed or, worse, misinformed. You hit upon the other challenge and that is the horrible decisions by our Supreme Court to equate money with free speech. America is more of an oligarchy right now with how candidates are selected and funded. We average Americans are not being listened to or are pretended to be listened to. The only ones with clout are the corporations who can actually influence legislators when they have passed poor laws.

      It should be noted that our forefathers were not fans of the two party system for the adversarial gamesmanship we see today.

      Like

      • cerddaf says:

        “America is more of an oligarchy right now with how candidates are selected and funded.”
        There is a cynical joke: What is the difference between the American and the UK system of government?
        The UK only has one Royal Family, and they never get to run the country.

        More seriously, thanks, btg8558 for an interesting post. Could you expand on your comment about the American Founding Fathers not being fans of the two party system?
        I have been reading Adam Smith’s Wealth of Nations. He blames the American Rebellion (he seems to be writing before 4-7-1776) on a British Parliament controlled by powerful merchant interests who used that influence to push through legislation to disadvantage Colonial businesses (and smaller British ones as well). Treat people badly enough and for long enough, and they will rebel.

        Like

        • Thanks. It was Thomas Jefferson, but it may have been George Washington, I believe who noted in the two party system, the constant jockeying for positions would lead to making promises to those who help them get elected. The people needing governing would be second fiddle to those special interests. They were very prescient in their observations. Unfortunately, our most recent solution was to add a more extreme sect within the Republican Party, rather than a more moderate one between the two. Combining this with pseudo news sources that misinform, and the debate is now further right of center to placate the extreme views.

          Your comments on the British Parliament resonates. If you disenfranchise people long enough, you should not be surprised that they find other means of governance. We see that in the Middle East and Africa where the disenfranchised are listening to extremists who point fingers of blame then take over their cause with violence.

          Like

  2. cerddaf says:

    I believe the Australians have a system where you have to go and vote, but you allowed to spoil your ballot.
    So repudiating all available condidates is allowed, just being apathetic is not.

    Like

  3. Good post. The UK system is still more tolerable than the US, arms race where billions are now needed to run for President. Plus, it is shorter which makes I more preferable. We are 19 months away and you would think the election was soon with all the histrionics.

    Everyone should vote, as in our country, we have a party that tends to win when fewer folks vote and does its best to make that happen.

    Like

  4. There are two quotes from Winston Churchill
    “Democracy is the worst form of government, except for all the others”
    and
    “The best argument against democracy is 10 minutes talking to the average voter”

    Yes they are both true, democracy is flawed. But so is everything else. That’s a basic Christian tenet.

    What we can do as Christians is try to make an imperfect system work as well as possible.

    What concerns me is that I don’t think we are doing a very good job of it. Party Leaders are chosen according to their photogenic looks, the scruffy, dowdy or just plain wrinkled are not acceptable. Parties seek to be judged, not on their policies and past performance, but on who can make the biggest promise. On the economy everything that went wrong under our government was caused by international markets, everything that goes wrong when the other lot are power is entirely due to their greed and stupidity.

    For democracy to work we need honest politicians and an involved, caring electorate that votes on principals not on tribal loyaties or more accurately tribal hatreds.

    I’m not sure we got enoough of either.

    Like

Please Add your comments

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: